Tag Archive for 'badidea'

Police to step up hacking of home PCs

I’ve just seen this article on The Times website (via Slashdot).

The Times article is pretty sensationalist, and I don’t get the feeling that the Slashdot discussion will be particularly balanced either judging by the ~40 comments that have been posted already, but I still think it’s a terrible idea with regards to privacy.

[Richard Clayton]said the authorities could break into a suspect’s home or office and insert a “key-logging” device into an individual’s computer. This would collect and, if necessary, transmit details of all the suspect’s keystrokes. “It’s just like putting a secret camera in someone’s living room,” he said.

Police might also send an e-mail to a suspect’s computer. The message would include an attachment that contained a virus or “malware”. If the attachment was opened, the remote search facility would be covertly activated. Alternatively, police could park outside a suspect’s home and hack into his or her hard drive using the wireless network.

I’d be interested to know how investigators would deal with someone who’s taken the time to properly secure their gear. Are the police and MI5 sitting on a stack of SSH or WPA2 0-days? Although if they can gain enough physical access to install key-loggers covertly, I don’t suppose a tightly locked-down system is going to do much good anyway.

Technology-related Idiocy

Every time a politician makes an idiotic statement about the Internet (or technology in general), I think of the pearls of wisdom contained in the Evil Overlord List:

12. One of my advisors will be an average five-year-old child. Any flaws in my plan that he is able to spot will be corrected before implementation.

It seems that Culture Secretary Andy Burnham would like to see “Cinema-style age ratings” for the Internet.

Giving film-style ratings to individual websites is one of the options being considered, he confirms. When asked directly whether age ratings could be introduced, Mr Burnham replies: “Yes, that would be an option. This is an area that is really now coming into full focus.”

ISPs, such as BT, Tiscali, AOL or Sky could also be forced to offer internet services where the only websites accessible are those deemed suitable for children.

It sounds like a good idea, unless you have the faintest clue about what the Internet is and how it works.

Leaving aside the billions of pages, images, videos and everything else that has already been uploaded, who is going to classify new content? And how can it be enforced when (maybe?) 90% of content is hosted outside of the UK?

I can’t see how it could work, but maybe that’s why I’m not a political advisor.

P.S — I cite the Evil Overlord List, but don’t always follow it myself. For instance:

35. I will not grow a goatee. In the old days they made you look diabolic. Now they just make you look like a disaffected member of Generation X.

Interesting.

Australian Internet Censorship Plans

Over the couple of days I’ve noticed a few articles referring to the Australian government’s plan for mandatory Internet filtering.

Setting aside the technical limitations of the scheme, I don’t like the idea that the Australian government can decide what is “unsuitable” for an adult to access on the Internet. Good thing I set-up a VPN before I left the UK.

(Yes – I’m aware that the UK also has filtering in place. Note the difference between “unsuitable” and “illegal” content)